Table 2

American College of Rheumatology response rates, safety, and immunogenicity during the open label extension period of study NCT01895309 that examined switching of etanercept to SB4 versus maintenance of SB4

ACR response, n/n’TimepointSB4/SB4 (n=126)ETN/SB4 (n=119)
ACR20Week 5299/125 (79.2%)98/119 (82.4%)
Week 76102/125 (81.6%)90/117 (76.9%)
Week 10095/122 (77.9%)91/115 (79.1%)
ACR50Week 5265/125 (52.0%)64/119 (53.8%)
Week 7674/125 (59.2%)62/117 (53.0%)
Week 10073/122 (59.8%)70/115 (60.9%)
ACR70Week 5248/125 (38.4%)39/119 (32.8%)
Week 7649/125 (39.2%)44/117 (37.6%)
Week 10052/122 (42.6%)48/115 (41.7%)
No of patients with, n (%)SB4/SB4 (n=126)ETN/SB4 (N=119)
≥1 TEA60 (47.6%)58 (48.7%)
≥1 SAE6 (4.8%)2 (1.7%)
Serious infection1 (0.8%)1 (0.8%)
Active tuburculosis0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
Injection site reactions*0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
Malignancy†1 (0.8%)0 (0.0%)
Death†1 (0.8%)0 (0.0%)
ADA positive‡1 (0.8%)1 (0.9%)§
  • *Defined as high level group in terms of administration site reactions.†Hepatic cancer was reported in SB4/SB4. ‡Defined as at least one ADA positive up to week 100 after week 52. §Percentage is based on the number of patients with ADA results (117 patients). ADA, anti drug antibody; SAE, serious adverse event; TEA, treatment emergent adverse event.